RTI Decisions since 2016

RTI Decisions since 2016

Right to Information Decision Bulletin

Would you like to be notified each month of the Ombudsman's latest external review decisions under the Right to Information Act 2009?  Send your name and email address to rti@ombudsman.tas.gov.au to subscribe to the Right to Information Decision Bulletin.

Decisions by year

Decisions by section of the Right to Information Act 2009

    Section 30 (Enforcement of Law)

    (March 2025)

    On 23 November 2023, Ms Kiera Salerno submitted an assessed disclosure application under the Right to Information Act 2009 (the Act) to Tasracing Pty Ltd requesting 8 items of information, which primarily related to a workplace dispute between Tasracing and the former General Manager of the Greyhound Adoption Program.

    Tasracing’s original decision held that exemptions pursuant to ss30, 31, 35, 36 of the Act applied to information responsive to Ms Salerno’s application. It also set out that information responsive to particular aspects of Ms Salerno’s application could not be located. The original decision was upheld by Tasracing on internal review.

    Ms Salerno sought external review. The Ombudsman determined that:

    • exemptions claimed pursuant to s30 were affirmed;
    • exemptions claimed pursuant to ss31, 35, and 36 were varied; and
    • Tasracing’s search for information responsive to Ms Salerno’s assessed disclosure application was sufficient.
    Section 31 (Legal Professional Privilege)

    (March 2025)

    On 23 November 2023, Ms Kiera Salerno submitted an assessed disclosure application under the Right to Information Act 2009 (the Act) to Tasracing Pty Ltd requesting 8 items of information, which primarily related to a workplace dispute between Tasracing and the former General Manager of the Greyhound Adoption Program.

    Tasracing’s original decision held that exemptions pursuant to ss30, 31, 35, 36 of the Act applied to information responsive to Ms Salerno’s application. It also set out that information responsive to particular aspects of Ms Salerno’s application could not be located. The original decision was upheld by Tasracing on internal review.

    Ms Salerno sought external review. The Ombudsman determined that:

    • exemptions claimed pursuant to s30 were affirmed;
    • exemptions claimed pursuant to ss31, 35, and 36 were varied; and
    • Tasracing’s search for information responsive to Ms Salerno’s assessed disclosure application was sufficient.
    Section 35 (Internal Deliberative Information)

    (March 2025)

    On 23 November 2023, Ms Kiera Salerno submitted an assessed disclosure application under the Right to Information Act 2009 (the Act) to Tasracing Pty Ltd requesting 8 items of information, which primarily related to a workplace dispute between Tasracing and the former General Manager of the Greyhound Adoption Program.

    Tasracing’s original decision held that exemptions pursuant to ss30, 31, 35, 36 of the Act applied to information responsive to Ms Salerno’s application. It also set out that information responsive to particular aspects of Ms Salerno’s application could not be located. The original decision was upheld by Tasracing on internal review.

    Ms Salerno sought external review. The Ombudsman determined that:

    • exemptions claimed pursuant to s30 were affirmed;
    • exemptions claimed pursuant to ss31, 35, and 36 were varied; and
    • Tasracing’s search for information responsive to Ms Salerno’s assessed disclosure application was sufficient.
    Section 36 (Personal Information)

    (March 2025)

    On 23 November 2023, Ms Kiera Salerno submitted an assessed disclosure application under the Right to Information Act 2009 (the Act) to Tasracing Pty Ltd requesting 8 items of information, which primarily related to a workplace dispute between Tasracing and the former General Manager of the Greyhound Adoption Program.

    Tasracing’s original decision held that exemptions pursuant to ss30, 31, 35, 36 of the Act applied to information responsive to Ms Salerno’s application. It also set out that information responsive to particular aspects of Ms Salerno’s application could not be located. The original decision was upheld by Tasracing on internal review.

    Ms Salerno sought external review. The Ombudsman determined that:

    • exemptions claimed pursuant to s30 were affirmed;
    • exemptions claimed pursuant to ss31, 35, and 36 were varied; and
    • Tasracing’s search for information responsive to Ms Salerno’s assessed disclosure application was sufficient.
    Sections 43-45 (Review Mechanisms)

    (March 2025)

    On 23 November 2023, Ms Kiera Salerno submitted an assessed disclosure application under the Right to Information Act 2009 (the Act) to Tasracing Pty Ltd requesting 8 items of information, which primarily related to a workplace dispute between Tasracing and the former General Manager of the Greyhound Adoption Program.

    Tasracing’s original decision held that exemptions pursuant to ss30, 31, 35, 36 of the Act applied to information responsive to Ms Salerno’s application. It also set out that information responsive to particular aspects of Ms Salerno’s application could not be located. The original decision was upheld by Tasracing on internal review.

    Ms Salerno sought external review. The Ombudsman determined that:

    • exemptions claimed pursuant to s30 were affirmed;
    • exemptions claimed pursuant to ss31, 35, and 36 were varied; and
    • Tasracing’s search for information responsive to Ms Salerno’s assessed disclosure application was sufficient.
Last updated: 10 June 2025